↓ Skip to main content

The effect of glycerol and humidity on desmosome degradation in stratum corneum

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Dermatological Research, May 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
211 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
The effect of glycerol and humidity on desmosome degradation in stratum corneum
Published in
Archives of Dermatological Research, May 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf00373429
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Rawlings, R. Sabin, C. Harding, A. Watkinson, J. Banks, C. Ackerman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 53 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 17 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Chemistry 3 5%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 21 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,566,705
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Dermatological Research
#337
of 1,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,539
of 25,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Dermatological Research
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,334 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 25,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them