| Title |
Coded Aperture Pairs for Depth from Defocus and Defocus Deblurring
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Computer Vision, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11263-010-0409-8 |
| Authors |
Changyin Zhou, Stephen Lin, Shree K. Nayar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| China | 2 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 36% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 28 | 36% |
| Computer Science | 27 | 35% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,566,705
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Vision
#398
of 1,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,448
of 181,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Vision
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.