| Title |
The effect of noncoherent red light irradiation on proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lasers in Medical Science, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10103-011-1005-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fei Peng, Hua Wu, Yadong Zheng, Xiqiang Xu, Jizhe Yu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 25% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 13% |
| Engineering | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,771,811
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Lasers in Medical Science
#123
of 1,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,805
of 140,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lasers in Medical Science
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,322 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them