↓ Skip to main content

Isolation of ethyl caffeate from the petals of Prunus yedoensis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Natural Medicines, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Isolation of ethyl caffeate from the petals of Prunus yedoensis
Published in
Journal of Natural Medicines, March 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11418-006-0033-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toshiro Noshita, Ai Sakaguchi, Shinji Funayama

Abstract

Ethyl caffeate was isolated from the petals of Prunus yedoensis (Rosaceae). This is the first example of its isolation from Prunus plants.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Engineering 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,566,705
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Natural Medicines
#91
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,935
of 72,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Natural Medicines
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them