↓ Skip to main content

Improved Results on Geometric Hitting Set Problems

Overview of attention for article published in Discrete & Computational Geometry, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Improved Results on Geometric Hitting Set Problems
Published in
Discrete & Computational Geometry, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00454-010-9285-9
Authors

Nabil H. Mustafa, Saurabh Ray

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 48%
Student > Master 5 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Researcher 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 21 78%
Mathematics 2 7%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,566,705
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Discrete & Computational Geometry
#112
of 484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,137
of 86,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Discrete & Computational Geometry
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 484 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.