| Title |
Powder Dissolution Method for Estimating Rotating Disk Intrinsic Dissolution Rates of Low Solubility Drugs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pharmaceutical Research, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11095-009-9921-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Konstantin Tsinman, Alex Avdeef, Oksana Tsinman, Dmytro Voloboy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 17% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 22 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 26 | 24% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 12% |
| Engineering | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,771,811
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#496
of 2,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,598
of 111,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.