| Title |
Selective Activation of Primary Afferent Fibers Evaluated by Sine-Wave Electrical Stimulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular Pain, March 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1744-8069-1-13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kohei Koga, Hidemasa Furue, Harunor Rashid, Atsushi Takaki, Toshihiko Katafuchi, Megumu Yoshimura |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 23% |
| Unknown | 19 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 24% |
| Engineering | 27 | 22% |
| Neuroscience | 23 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Pain
#190
of 669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,945
of 74,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Pain
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.