| Title |
Bundle and Pool Architecture for Multi-Language, Robust, Scalable Workflow Executions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Grid Computing, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10723-013-9267-2 |
| Authors |
David Rogers, Ian Harvey, Tram Truong Huu, Kieran Evans, Tristan Glatard, Ibrahim Kallel, Ian Taylor, Johan Montagnat, Andrew Jones, Andrew Harrison |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Singapore | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 33% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 17% |
| Librarian | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 14 | 78% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,566,705
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Grid Computing
#35
of 118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,479
of 198,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Grid Computing
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them