↓ Skip to main content

Novel linear ion trap mass analyzer composed of four planar electrodes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Novel linear ion trap mass analyzer composed of four planar electrodes
Published in
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, April 2006
DOI 10.1016/j.jasms.2005.12.014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yishu Song, Guangxiang Wu, Qingyu Song, R. Graham Cooks, Zheng Ouyang, Wolfgang R. Plass

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Professor 5 19%
Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 11 42%
Physics and Astronomy 6 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#1,226
of 3,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,184
of 84,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,834 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.