| Title |
Neuronal failure in Alzheimer’s disease: a view through the oxidative stress looking-glass
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuroscience Bulletin, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12264-013-1424-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David J. Bonda, Xinglong Wang, Hyoung-Gon Lee, Mark A. Smith, George Perry, Xiongwei Zhu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 21 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,566,705
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Neuroscience Bulletin
#229
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,889
of 227,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroscience Bulletin
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.