| Title |
Oncogenic mechanisms in myeloproliferative disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, November 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00018-006-6272-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
F. Delhommeau, D. F. Pisani, C. James, N. Casadevall, S. Constantinescu, W. Vainchenker |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 45 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
| Researcher | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2021.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#2,292
of 6,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,243
of 172,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#19
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,041 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.