↓ Skip to main content

Epidemiology and consequences of sarcopenia

Overview of attention for article published in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
265 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
257 Mendeley
Title
Epidemiology and consequences of sarcopenia
Published in
The journal of nutrition, health & aging, October 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12603-009-0201-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Abellan Van Kan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 253 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 14%
Student > Bachelor 29 11%
Researcher 21 8%
Professor 20 8%
Other 54 21%
Unknown 55 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 31%
Sports and Recreations 30 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 9%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 66 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2021.
All research outputs
#8,681,963
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#1,093
of 2,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,084
of 107,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.