| Title |
Molecular Imaging Applications in Nanomedicine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biomedical Microdevices, June 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1023/b:bmmd.0000031747.05317.81 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
King C.P. Li, Sunil D. Pandit, Samira Guccione, Mark D. Bednarski |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 61 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 24% |
| Researcher | 13 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 24% |
| Unknown | 14 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Microdevices
#267
of 813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,855
of 62,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Microdevices
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 813 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.