| Title |
Characterization of a Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis population in Israel
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Plant Pathology, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10658-007-9264-z |
| Authors |
Frida Kleitman, Isaac Barash, Annette Burger, Naim Iraki, Yunis Falah, Guido Sessa, Dan Weinthal, Laura Chalupowicz, Karl-Heinz Gartemann, Rudolf Eichenlaub, Shulamit Manulis-Sasson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 60 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 21% |
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 68% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,771,811
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#206
of 949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,740
of 156,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 949 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them