↓ Skip to main content

An update on the role of the inflammasomes in the pathogenesis of kidney diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
An update on the role of the inflammasomes in the pathogenesis of kidney diseases
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00467-015-3153-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Murthy N. Darisipudi, Felix Knauf

Abstract

Innate immune response pathways play a critical role as the first line of defense. Initiation of an immune response requires sensors that can detect noxious stimuli within the cellular microenvironment. Inflammasomes are signaling platforms that are assembled in response to both microbe-specific and nonmicrobial antigens. Upon activation, proinflammatory cytokines are released to engage immune defenses and to trigger an inflammatory cell death referred to as pyroptosis. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current knowledge of the role of the inflammasomes in the pathogenesis of kidney diseases. As crystal deposition in the kidney is a frequent cause of acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease in children, recent insights into mechanisms of inflammasome activation by renal crystals are highlighted. This may be of particular interest to pediatric patients and nephrologists in need of new therapeutic approaches. Lastly, current data findings that inflammasomes are not only of major importance in host defense but are also a key regulator of the intestinal microbiota and the progression of systemic diseases are reviewed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 82 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 13%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Master 9 11%
Unspecified 8 10%
Other 25 30%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 13%
Unspecified 9 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 12 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2015.
All research outputs
#14,818,555
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#2,543
of 3,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,619
of 262,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#20
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,540 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.