↓ Skip to main content

Frequent mutations in chromatin-remodelling genes in pulmonary carcinoids

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
247 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Frequent mutations in chromatin-remodelling genes in pulmonary carcinoids
Published in
Nature Communications, March 2014
DOI 10.1038/ncomms4518
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lynnette Fernandez-Cuesta, Martin Peifer, Xin Lu, Ruping Sun, Luka Ozretić, Danila Seidel, Thomas Zander, Frauke Leenders, Julie George, Christian Müller, Ilona Dahmen, Berit Pinther, Graziella Bosco, Kathryn Konrad, Janine Altmüller, Peter Nürnberg, Viktor Achter, Ulrich Lang, Peter M. Schneider, Magdalena Bogus, Alex Soltermann, Odd Terje Brustugun, Åslaug Helland, Steinar Solberg, Marius Lund-Iversen, Sascha Ansén, Erich Stoelben, Gavin M. Wright, Prudence Russell, Zoe Wainer, Benjamin Solomon, John K. Field, Russell Hyde, Michael P. A. Davies, Lukas C. Heukamp, Iver Petersen, Sven Perner, Christine M. Lovly, Federico Cappuzzo, William D. Travis, Jürgen Wolf, Martin Vingron, Elisabeth Brambilla, Stefan A. Haas, Reinhard Buettner, Roman K. Thomas

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 144 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 42 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Other 12 8%
Student > Master 10 7%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 23 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 18%
Computer Science 5 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 26 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2015.
All research outputs
#4,176,961
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#31,171
of 46,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,766
of 224,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#276
of 477 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46,985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 477 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.