↓ Skip to main content

Brief Report: Forecasting the Economic Burden of Autism in 2015 and 2025 in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 5,442)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
88 X users
patent
11 patents
facebook
20 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
280 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
412 Mendeley
Title
Brief Report: Forecasting the Economic Burden of Autism in 2015 and 2025 in the United States
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10803-015-2521-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Paul Leigh, Juan Du

Abstract

Few US estimates of the economic burden of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are available and none provide estimates for 2015 and 2025. We forecast annual direct medical, direct non-medical, and productivity costs combined will be $268 billion (range $162-$367 billion; 0.884-2.009 % of GDP) for 2015 and $461 billion (range $276-$1011 billion; 0.982-3.600 % of GDP) for 2025. These 2015 figures are on a par with recent estimates for diabetes and attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and exceed the costs of stroke and hypertension. If the prevalence of ASD continues to grow as it has in recent years, ASD costs will likely far exceed those of diabetes and ADHD by 2025.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 412 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 406 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 16%
Researcher 56 14%
Student > Master 53 13%
Student > Bachelor 29 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 7%
Other 81 20%
Unknown 102 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 71 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 50 12%
Neuroscience 31 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 5%
Other 95 23%
Unknown 127 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 227. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#171,682
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#35
of 5,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,591
of 259,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.