↓ Skip to main content

Identifying marine Important Bird Areas using at-sea survey data

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying marine Important Bird Areas using at-sea survey data
Published in
Biological Conservation, April 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.02.039
Authors

Melanie A. Smith, Nathan J. Walker, Christopher M. Free, Matthew J. Kirchhoff, Gary S. Drew, Nils Warnock, Iain J. Stenhouse

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 111 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 24%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Other 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 19 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 44%
Environmental Science 32 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 18 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2015.
All research outputs
#4,835,823
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#2,888
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,970
of 239,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#27
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.