↓ Skip to main content

Factors Influencing the Spatial Variation of Microplastics on High-Tidal Coastal Beaches in Korea

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
9 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
308 Mendeley
Title
Factors Influencing the Spatial Variation of Microplastics on High-Tidal Coastal Beaches in Korea
Published in
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00244-015-0155-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

In-Sung Kim, Doo-Hyeon Chae, Seung-Kyu Kim, SooBong Choi, Seung-Bum Woo

Abstract

The presence and distribution characteristics of microplastics become a big issue due to the adverse effects on marine organisms caused by not only microplastics but any incorporated and/or adsorbed pollutants. Distribution of microplastics (50- to 5000-μm size) was determined for three sandy beaches on an isolated island in a high-tidal costal region to elucidate spatial distributions in relation to beach locations. The abundances of microplastics (n = 21) measured were 56-285,673 (46,334 ± 71,291) particles/m(2) corresponding to the highest level globally. Out of observed polymer types, expanded polystyrene was overwhelmingly dominant. Although lying toward the estuary of the largest river in the country, the north-side beach contained a 100-fold lower abundance than two south-side beaches that faced southerly wind and currents that were prevalent throughout the study season. In addition, distinct differences between the beaches on either side were also present in terms of size distribution and spatial homogeneity of microplastics on the same beach. Winds and currents are therefore considered to be the driving forces in the distribution of microplastics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Philippines 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 304 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 47 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 14%
Student > Master 43 14%
Researcher 41 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 90 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 92 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 6%
Engineering 17 6%
Chemistry 7 2%
Other 20 6%
Unknown 110 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,328,983
of 24,727,020 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#76
of 2,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,600
of 269,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,727,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.