| Title |
A Cell‐free Scaffold‐based Cartilage Repair Provides Improved Function Hyaline‐like Repair at One year
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-011-2107-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alberto Siclari, Gennaro Mascaro, Chiara Gentili, Ranieri Cancedda, Eugenio Boux |
| Abstract |
Bone marrow stimulation techniques in cartilage repair such as drilling are limited by the formation of fibrous to hyaline-like repair tissue. It has been suggested such techniques can be enhanced by covering the defect with scaffolds. We present an innovative approach using a polyglycolic acid (PGA)-hyaluronan scaffold with platelet-rich-plasma (PRP) in drilling. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 150 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 13% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Researcher | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 42 | 27% |
| Unknown | 28 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 7% |
| Engineering | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 40 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2021.
All research outputs
#4,760,313
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#1,025
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,525
of 143,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#16
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.