↓ Skip to main content

Pulse-burst PIV of an impulsively started cylinder in a shock tube for Re > 105

Overview of attention for article published in Experiments in Fluids, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Pulse-burst PIV of an impulsively started cylinder in a shock tube for Re > 105
Published in
Experiments in Fluids, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00348-018-2558-4
Authors

Justin L. Wagner, Edward P. DeMauro, Katya M. Casper, Steven J. Beresh, Kyle P. Lynch, Brian O. Pruett

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Student > Master 2 15%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 7 54%
Computer Science 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2018.
All research outputs
#20,512,427
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Experiments in Fluids
#991
of 1,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,331
of 330,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experiments in Fluids
#2
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,288 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.