| Title |
Contribution of discourse and morphosyntax skills to reading comprehension in Chinese dyslexic and typically developing children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Dyslexia, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11881-010-0045-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pakey Pui-man Chik, Connie Suk-han Ho, Pui-sze Yeung, Yau-kai Wong, David Wai-ock Chan, Kevin Kien-hoa Chung, Lap-yan Lo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 16% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 18% |
| Unknown | 27 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 32 | 32% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 14% |
| Linguistics | 7 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 32 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,566,705
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Dyslexia
#84
of 250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,666
of 96,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Dyslexia
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.