You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Corneal Regeneration Following Implantation of a Biomimetic Tissue‐Engineered Substitute
|
---|---|
Published in |
CTS: Clinical & Translational Science, March 2009
|
DOI | 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2008.00083.x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Per Fagerholm, Neil S. Lagali, David J. Carlsson, Kimberley Merrett, May Griffith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Sweden | 1 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 77 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 28% |
Researcher | 10 | 12% |
Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 15% |
Unknown | 14 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 26% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 19% |
Engineering | 11 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
Materials Science | 5 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Unknown | 17 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from CTS: Clinical & Translational Science
#369
of 1,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,509
of 108,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CTS: Clinical & Translational Science
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,013 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them