↓ Skip to main content

Corneal Regeneration Following Implantation of a Biomimetic Tissue‐Engineered Substitute

Overview of attention for article published in CTS: Clinical & Translational Science, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corneal Regeneration Following Implantation of a Biomimetic Tissue‐Engineered Substitute
Published in
CTS: Clinical & Translational Science, March 2009
DOI 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2008.00083.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Per Fagerholm, Neil S. Lagali, David J. Carlsson, Kimberley Merrett, May Griffith

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Sweden 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 77 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 28%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 19%
Engineering 11 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Materials Science 5 6%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 17 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from CTS: Clinical & Translational Science
#369
of 1,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,509
of 108,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CTS: Clinical & Translational Science
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,013 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them