↓ Skip to main content

High Incidence of Noonan Syndrome Features Including Short Stature and Pulmonic Stenosis in Patients carrying NF1 Missense Mutations Affecting p.Arg1809: Genotype–Phenotype Correlation

Overview of attention for article published in Human Mutation, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
150 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High Incidence of Noonan Syndrome Features Including Short Stature and Pulmonic Stenosis in Patients carrying NF1 Missense Mutations Affecting p.Arg1809: Genotype–Phenotype Correlation
Published in
Human Mutation, August 2015
DOI 10.1002/humu.22832
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kitiwan Rojnueangnit, Jing Xie, Alicia Gomes, Angela Sharp, Tom Callens, Yunjia Chen, Ying Liu, Meagan Cochran, Mary‐Alice Abbott, Joan Atkin, Dusica Babovic‐Vuksanovic, Christopher P. Barnett, Melissa Crenshaw, Dennis W. Bartholomew, Lina Basel, Gary Bellus, Shay Ben‐Shachar, Martin G. Bialer, David Bick, Bruce Blumberg, Fanny Cortes, Karen L. David, Anne Destree, Anna Duat‐Rodriguez, Dawn Earl, Luis Escobar, Marthanda Eswara, Begona Ezquieta, Ian M. Frayling, Moshe Frydman, Kathy Gardner, Karen W. Gripp, Concepcion Hernández‐Chico, Kurt Heyrman, Jennifer Ibrahim, Sandra Janssens, Beth A Keena, Isabel Llano‐Rivas, Kathy Leppig, Marie McDonald, Vinod K. Misra, Jennifer Mulbury, Vinodh Narayanan, Naama Orenstein, Patricia Galvin‐Parton, Helio Pedro, Eniko K. Pivnick, Cynthia M. Powell, Linda Randolph, Salmo Raskin, Jordi Rosell, Karol Rubin, Margretta Seashore, Christian P. Schaaf, Angela Scheuerle, Meredith Schultz, Elizabeth Schorry, Rhonda Schnur, Elizabeth Siqveland, Amanda Tkachuk, James Tonsgard, Meena Upadhyaya, Ishwar C. Verma, Stephanie Wallace, Charles Williams, Elaine Zackai, Jonathan Zonana, Conxi Lazaro, Kathleen Claes, Bruce Korf, Yolanda Martin, Eric Legius, Ludwine Messiaen

Abstract

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is one of the most frequent genetic disorders, affecting 1:3000 worldwide. Identification of genotype-phenotype correlations is challenging due to the wide range clinical variability, the progressive nature of the disorder and extreme diversity of the mutational spectrum. We report 136 individuals with a distinct phenotype carrying one of 5 different NF1 missense mutations affecting p.Arg1809. Patients presented with multiple café-au-lait macules (CALM) with or without freckling and Lisch nodules, but no externally visible plexiform neurofibromas or clear cutaneous neurofibromas were found. About 25% of the individuals had Noonan-like features. Pulmonic stenosis and short stature were significantly more prevalent compared to classic cohorts (p<0.0001). Developmental delays and/or learning disabilities were reported in over 50% of patients. Melanocytes cultured from a CALM in a segmental NF1-patient showed two different somatic NF1 mutations, p.Arg1809Cys and a multi-exon deletion, providing genetic evidence that p.Arg1809Cys is a loss-of-function mutation in the melanocytes and causes a pigmentary phenotype. Constitutional missense mutations at p.Arg1809 affect 1.23% of unrelated NF1 probands in the UAB cohort, therefore this specific NF1 genotype-phenotype correlation will affect counseling and management of a significant number of patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 119 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 16%
Student > Master 15 12%
Other 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 32 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Psychology 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 41 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2016.
All research outputs
#2,002,329
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Human Mutation
#102
of 2,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,817
of 267,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Mutation
#7
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,928 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.