↓ Skip to main content

Possible use of biosolids in fired-clay bricks

Overview of attention for article published in Construction & Building Materials, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Possible use of biosolids in fired-clay bricks
Published in
Construction & Building Materials, August 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.033
Authors

Aruna Ukwatta, Abbas Mohajerani, Sujeeva Setunge, Nicky Eshtiaghi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 129 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 7 5%
Other 7 5%
Other 30 23%
Unknown 34 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 49 37%
Materials Science 8 6%
Environmental Science 7 5%
Energy 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 41 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Construction & Building Materials
#2,564
of 2,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,288
of 276,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Construction & Building Materials
#36
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,830 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.