| Title |
On the physical rationale of laser induced hyperthermia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lasers in Medical Science, June 1990
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02031373 |
| Authors |
Lars O. Svaasand, Charles J. Gomer, Elisa Morinelli |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 21 | 26% |
| Materials Science | 9 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 17 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,566,705
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Lasers in Medical Science
#284
of 1,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,635
of 16,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lasers in Medical Science
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,322 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.