| Title |
Building the Case for Localized Approaches to HIV: Structural Conditions and Health System Capacity to Address the HIV/AIDS Epidemic in Six US Cities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
AIDS and Behavior, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10461-018-2166-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D. Panagiotoglou, M. Olding, B. Enns, D. J. Feaster, C. del Rio, L. R. Metsch, R. M. Granich, S. A. Strathdee, B. D. L. Marshall, M. R. Golden, S. Shoptaw, B. R. Schackman, B. Nosyk, the Localized HIV Modeling Study Group |
| Abstract |
Since the discovery of the secondary preventive benefits of antiretroviral therapy, national and international governing bodies have called for countries to reach 90% diagnosis, ART engagement and viral suppression among people living with HIV/AIDS. The US HIV epidemic is dispersed primarily across large urban centers, each with different underlying epidemiological and structural features. We selected six US cities, including Atlanta, Baltimore, Los Angeles, Miami, New York, and Seattle, with the objective of demonstrating the breadth of epidemiological and structural differences affecting the HIV/AIDS response across the US. We synthesized current and publicly-available surveillance, legal statutes, entitlement and discretionary funding, and service location data for each city. The vast differences we observed in each domain reinforce disparities in access to HIV treatment and prevention, and necessitate targeted, localized strategies to optimize the limited resources available for each city's HIV/AIDS response. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 53% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 65% |
| Scientists | 4 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 20% |
| Unknown | 28 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 14 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 34 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2018.
All research outputs
#2,910,405
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#410
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,908
of 332,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#12
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.