| Title |
Recent advances in drying and dehydration of fruits and vegetables: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Food Science and Technology, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13197-010-0010-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
V. R. Sagar, P. Suresh Kumar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,080 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1062 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 175 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 155 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 133 | 12% |
| Researcher | 97 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 50 | 5% |
| Other | 167 | 15% |
| Unknown | 303 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 237 | 22% |
| Engineering | 213 | 20% |
| Chemical Engineering | 59 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 52 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 29 | 3% |
| Other | 113 | 10% |
| Unknown | 377 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,679,893
of 25,295,968 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Food Science and Technology
#216
of 1,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,137
of 176,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Food Science and Technology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,295,968 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them