| Title |
Factors that degrade the match distribution in iris biometrics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Identity in the Information Society, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12394-009-0037-z |
| Authors |
Kevin W. Bowyer, Sarah E. Baker, Amanda Hentz, Karen Hollingsworth, Tanya Peters, Patrick J. Flynn |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 27% |
| Researcher | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 3 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 17 | 57% |
| Engineering | 8 | 27% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,566,705
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Identity in the Information Society
#16
of 42 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,745
of 164,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Identity in the Information Society
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one scored the same or higher as 26 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them