↓ Skip to main content

Surgical trauma induces postoperative T-cell dysfunction in lung cancer patients through the programmed death-1 pathway

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Surgical trauma induces postoperative T-cell dysfunction in lung cancer patients through the programmed death-1 pathway
Published in
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00262-015-1740-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pingbo Xu, Ping Zhang, Zhirong Sun, Yun Wang, Jiawei Chen, Changhong Miao

Abstract

The programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) pathway have been shown to be involved in tumor-induced and sepsis-induced immunosuppression. However, whether this pathway is involved in the surgery-induced dysfunction of T lymphocytes is not known. Here, we analyzed expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 on human peripheral mononuclear cells during the perioperative period. We found that surgery increased PD-1/PD-L1 expression on immune cells, which was correlated with the severity of surgical trauma. The count of T lymphocytes and natural killer cells reduced after surgery, probably due to the increased activity of caspase-3. Caspase-3 level was positively correlated with PD-1 expression. Profile of perioperative cytokines and hormones in plasma showed a significantly increased level of interferon-α, as well as various inflammatory cytokines and stress hormones. In ex vivo experiments, administration of anti-PD-1 antibody significantly ameliorated T-cell proliferation and partially reversed the T-cell apoptosis induced by surgical trauma. We provide evidences that surgical trauma can induce immunosuppression through the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway. This pathway could be a target for preventing postoperative cellular immunosuppression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Professor 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 15 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2015.
All research outputs
#20,283,046
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#2,598
of 2,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,913
of 234,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#28
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.