↓ Skip to main content

Levosimendan: from basic science to clinical practice

Overview of attention for article published in Heart Failure Reviews, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Levosimendan: from basic science to clinical practice
Published in
Heart Failure Reviews, December 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10741-008-9128-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

John T. Parissis, Pinelopi Rafouli-Stergiou, Ioannis Paraskevaidis, Alexandre Mebazaa

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Finland 1 2%
Unknown 39 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Master 5 12%
Professor 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 7 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,566,705
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Heart Failure Reviews
#233
of 672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,020
of 169,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart Failure Reviews
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.