Title |
Unsupervised guided docking of covalently bound ligands
|
---|---|
Published in |
Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, February 2005
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10822-004-5291-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xavier Fradera, Jasmit Kaur, Jordi Mestres |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Belgium | 1 | 2% |
South Africa | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 40 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 32% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 18% |
Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 27% |
Chemistry | 10 | 23% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 7 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,330,983
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#175
of 949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,618
of 157,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them