| Title |
Protein tyrosine phosphatases in glioma biology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Neuropathologica, November 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00401-009-0614-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna C. Navis, Monique van den Eijnden, Jan T. G. Schepens, Rob Hooft van Huijsduijnen, Pieter Wesseling, Wiljan J. A. J. Hendriks |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 26% |
| Researcher | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 21% |
| Unknown | 8 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 36% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,567,797
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#1,371
of 2,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,872
of 167,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.