↓ Skip to main content

Using invertebrate model organisms for neuroscience research and training: an opportunity for Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Metabolic Brain Disease, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Using invertebrate model organisms for neuroscience research and training: an opportunity for Africa
Published in
Metabolic Brain Disease, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11011-018-0250-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wasiu Gbolahan Balogun, Ansa Emmanuel Cobham, Abdulbasit Amin, Azman Seeni

Abstract

Africa is faced with an increasing underrepresentation of her research progress in many fields of science including neuroscience. This underrepresentation stems from the very low investments directed towards research by African governments as these are thought to be high-priced. Scientists and researchers within the continent are left to compete highly for the very limited research grants or choose to fund research from their personal purse. Therefore, presenting a need for all possible strategies to make science and research approaches more affordable in Africa. This paper presents one of such strategy, which advocates the use of invertebrate animal models for neuroscience research in place of the commonly used vertebrate models. Invertebrates are cheaper, more available and easy to handle options and their use is on the rise, even in the developed societies of the world. Here, we investigate the current state of invertebrate neuroscience research in Africa looking at countries and institutions conducting neuroscience research with invertebrates and their publication output. We discuss the factors which impede invertebrate neuroscience research in Africa like lack of research infrastructure and adequate expert scientists and conclude by suggesting solutions to these challenges.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 17%
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Other 4 22%
Unknown 5 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2018.
All research outputs
#15,530,583
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from Metabolic Brain Disease
#587
of 1,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,201
of 330,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metabolic Brain Disease
#17
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.