↓ Skip to main content

The mechanisms of action of St. John’s wort: an update

Overview of attention for article published in Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
The mechanisms of action of St. John’s wort: an update
Published in
Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10354-015-0372-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mathias Schmidt, Veronika Butterweck

Abstract

Pharmacological research confirms and supports the clinically observed antidepressant efficacy of St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum L., SJW). This contribution is an update of a former review by the authors in 2007. Positive evidence of antidepressant effects has been found with SJW preparations, extract fractions, and single constituents. The efficacy of SJW is obviously defined by a range of parallel mechanisms of action, triggered by different constituents. In vitro research showed, among other tests, positive effects in neurotransmitter regulation (in beta adrenergic systems and glutamate receptors) and ion channel conductance. Antidepressant effects were confirmed in typical in vivo models such as the forced swimming test, the open field test, the tail suspension test, or a model of stress-impaired memory. The overall effect cannot be attributed to a single constituent or fraction. SJW is therefore an outstanding example of the total extract being defined as the active constituent of herbal medicines.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Master 2 6%
Professor 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 17 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Chemistry 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 18 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,866,480
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift
#125
of 436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,387
of 236,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 436 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.