| Title |
The Septic Brain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurochemical Research, May 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11064-008-9671-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emilio L. Streck, Clarissa M. Comim, Tatiana Barichello, João Quevedo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Greece | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 13% |
| Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 29 | 34% |
| Unknown | 4 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 53% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2015.
All research outputs
#18,418,919
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Neurochemical Research
#1,491
of 2,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,645
of 78,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurochemical Research
#22
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,097 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.