↓ Skip to main content

CD40-CD40 Ligand Pathway Is a Major Component of Acute Neuroinflammation and Contributes to Long-term Cognitive Dysfunction after Sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Medicine, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
CD40-CD40 Ligand Pathway Is a Major Component of Acute Neuroinflammation and Contributes to Long-term Cognitive Dysfunction after Sepsis
Published in
Molecular Medicine, March 2015
DOI 10.2119/molmed.2015.00070
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monique Michels, Lucinéia Gainski Danieslki, Andriele Vieira, Drielly Florentino, Dhébora Dall’Igna, Letícia Galant, Beatriz Sonai, Francieli Vuolo, Franciele Mina, Bruna Pescador, Diogo Dominguini, Tatiana Barichello, Joäo Quevedo, Felipe Dal-Pizzol, Fabrícia Petronilho

Abstract

Sepsis associated encephalopathy (SAE) is associated with an increased rate of morbidity and mortality. It is not understood what the exact mechanism is for the brain dysfunction that occurs in septic patients, but brain inflammation and oxidative stress are a possible theory. Such events can occur through the alteration of molecules that perpetuate the inflammatory response. Thus, it is possible to postulate that CD40 may be involved in this process. The aim of this work is to evaluate the role of CD40-CD40L pathway activation in brain dysfunction associated with sepsis in an animal model. Microglia activation induces the upregulation of CD40-CD40L, both in vitro and in vivo. The inhibition of microglia activation decreases levels of CD40-CD40L in the brain, and decreases brain inflammation, oxidative damage and blood brain barrier dysfunction. Despite this, anti-CD40 treatment does not improve mortality in this model. However, it is able to improve long-term cognitive impairment in sepsis survivors. In conclusion, there is a major involvement of the CD40-CD40L signaling pathway in long-term brain dysfunction in an animal model of sepsis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Professor 6 9%
Researcher 6 9%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 26%
Neuroscience 16 25%
Psychology 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 15 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2015.
All research outputs
#20,283,046
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Medicine
#999
of 1,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,977
of 263,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Medicine
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.