Title |
Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guidelines: Instrumentation, Acquisition, Processing, and Interpretation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, October 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12350-018-1283-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sharmila Dorbala, Karthik Ananthasubramaniam, Ian S Armstrong, Panithaya Chareonthaitawee, E Gordon DePuey, Andrew J Einstein, Robert J Gropler, Thomas A Holly, John J Mahmarian, Mi-Ae Park, Donna M Polk, Raymond Russell, Piotr J Slomka, Randall C Thompson, R Glenn Wells |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 10 | 33% |
Saudi Arabia | 4 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
Mexico | 2 | 7% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Russia | 1 | 3% |
Kuwait | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 8 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 17 | 57% |
Scientists | 6 | 20% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 276 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 28 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 28 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 10% |
Other | 26 | 9% |
Student > Master | 21 | 8% |
Other | 58 | 21% |
Unknown | 88 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 89 | 32% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 5% |
Physics and Astronomy | 13 | 5% |
Engineering | 12 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
Other | 27 | 10% |
Unknown | 112 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2023.
All research outputs
#424,911
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#9
of 2,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,189
of 354,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.