↓ Skip to main content

Fracture behavior of Cu-cored solder joints

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Fracture behavior of Cu-cored solder joints
Published in
Journal of Materials Science, June 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10853-011-5654-x
Authors

Yunsung Kim, Hyelim Choi, Hyoungjoo Lee, Dongjun Shin, Jeongtak Moon, Heeman Choe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 1 17%
Materials Science 1 17%
Unknown 4 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#1,037
of 4,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,845
of 123,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,988 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.