↓ Skip to main content

High‐Pressure Synthesis of a Nitrogen‐Rich Inclusion Compound ReN8⋅x N2 with Conjugated Polymeric Nitrogen Chains

Overview of attention for article published in Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 50,321)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
55 news outlets
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High‐Pressure Synthesis of a Nitrogen‐Rich Inclusion Compound ReN8⋅x N2 with Conjugated Polymeric Nitrogen Chains
Published in
Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, June 2018
DOI 10.1002/anie.201805152
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maxim Bykov, Elena Bykova, Egor Koemets, Timofey Fedotenko, Georgios Aprilis, Konstantin Glazyrin, Hanns‐Peter Liermann, Alena V. Ponomareva, Johan Tidholm, Ferenc Tasnádi, Igor A. Abrikosov, Natalia Dubrovinskaia, Leonid Dubrovinsky

Abstract

A novel nitrogen-rich compound, ReN8·xN2, was synthesized via a direct reaction between rhenium and nitrogen at high pressure and high temperature in a laser-heated diamond anvil cell. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction revealed that the crystal structure, which is based on the ReN8 framework, has rectangular-shaped channels that accommodate nitrogen molecules. Thus, despite a very high synthesis pressure, exceeding 100 GPa, ReN8·xN2 is an inclusion compound. The amount of trapped nitrogen (x) depends on the synthesis conditions. The polydiazenediyl chains [-N=N-]∞, which constitute the framework, have not been previously observed in any compound. Ab initio calculations on ReN8·xN2 provide strong support for the experimental results and conclusions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 28%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Other 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 18%
Physics and Astronomy 6 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 10%
Materials Science 4 10%
Unspecified 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 430. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2018.
All research outputs
#67,011
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#8
of 50,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,441
of 341,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#1
of 813 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50,321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 813 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.