| Title |
A comparison of polymer substrates for photolithographic processing of flexible bioelectronics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biomedical Microdevices, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10544-013-9782-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dustin Simon, Taylor Ware, Ryan Marcotte, Benjamin R. Lund, Dennis W. Smith, Matthew Di Prima, Robert L. Rennaker, Walter Voit |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 25 | 28% |
| Materials Science | 15 | 17% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 20% |
| Unknown | 18 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,567,797
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Microdevices
#238
of 755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,497
of 195,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Microdevices
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 755 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.