You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A simple and cost-effective method for screening of CRISPR/Cas9-induced homozygous/biallelic mutants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-018-0305-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jinggong Guo, Kun Li, Lifeng Jin, Rui Xu, Kaiting Miao, Fengbo Yang, Chaoya Qi, Lin Zhang, Jose R. Botella, Ran Wang, Yuchen Miao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 110 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
| Researcher | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 29 | 26% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | <1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 28 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2018.
All research outputs
#8,155,476
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#519
of 1,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,168
of 348,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#15
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.