| Title |
Lower limb lengthening: is there a difference in the lengthening index and infection rates of lengthening with external fixators, external fixators with intramedullary nails or intramedullary nailing alone? A systematic review of the literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00590-009-0504-0 |
| Authors |
Mark Brian Stephen Brewster, Cyril Mauffrey, Andrew C. Lewis, Peter Hull |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 25% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 25% |
| Other | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Researcher | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 75% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,567,797
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#155
of 885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,628
of 111,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 885 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them