| Title |
Automatic selection of optimal systolic and diastolic reconstruction windows for dual-source CT coronary angiography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, February 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-009-1329-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
H. Seifarth, M. Puesken, S. Wienbeck, D. Maintz, R. Fischbach, W. Heindel, K.-U. Juergens |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 17% |
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 28% |
| Unknown | 5 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 45% |
| Engineering | 4 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 7% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,567,797
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#1,157
of 4,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,398
of 94,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#6
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,183 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.