| Title |
Importance of Shrinkage in Empirical Bayes Estimates for Diagnostics: Problems and Solutions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The AAPS Journal, August 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1208/s12248-009-9133-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Radojka M. Savic, Mats O. Karlsson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 316 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 101 | 31% |
| Researcher | 76 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 11% |
| Unknown | 49 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 94 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 13% |
| Mathematics | 17 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 8% |
| Unknown | 61 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,721,979
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from The AAPS Journal
#245
of 1,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,285
of 110,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AAPS Journal
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.