Title |
Interactions between fire and flooding in a southern African floodplain system (Okavango Delta, Botswana)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Landscape Ecology, July 2006
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10980-005-5243-y |
Authors |
Michael Heinl, Amy Neuenschwander, Jan Sliva, Cornelis Vanderpost |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 3 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 66 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 18 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Other | 15 | 21% |
Unknown | 10 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 24 | 34% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 27% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 11% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
Other | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 16 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2018.
All research outputs
#5,826,191
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from Landscape Ecology
#546
of 1,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,846
of 64,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape Ecology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.