↓ Skip to main content

Word normalization and decompounding in mono- and bilingual IR

Overview of attention for article published in Information Retrieval Journal, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Word normalization and decompounding in mono- and bilingual IR
Published in
Information Retrieval Journal, June 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10791-006-0884-2
Authors

Eija Airio

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 6%
Czechia 1 6%
Unknown 15 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 29%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Librarian 2 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 13 76%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Linguistics 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2017.
All research outputs
#8,064,660
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Information Retrieval Journal
#60
of 184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,685
of 66,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Information Retrieval Journal
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 184 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them