| Title |
Encapsulation of Bifidobacterium adolescentis cells with legume proteins and survival under stimulated gastric conditions and during storage in commercial fruit juices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Food Science and Biotechnology, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10068-015-0051-x |
| Authors |
Jiapei Wang, Darren R. Korber, Nicholas H. Low, Michael T. Nickerson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 24% |
| Unknown | 8 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 38% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,567,797
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from Food Science and Biotechnology
#104
of 441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,261
of 264,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Science and Biotechnology
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.