↓ Skip to main content

New concentration inequalities in product spaces

Overview of attention for article published in Inventiones mathematicae, November 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
330 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
New concentration inequalities in product spaces
Published in
Inventiones mathematicae, November 1996
DOI 10.1007/s002220050108
Authors

Michel Talagrand

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 7%
Germany 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 51 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 28%
Researcher 14 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Student > Master 3 5%
Professor 2 4%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 19 33%
Computer Science 11 19%
Engineering 9 16%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Inventiones mathematicae
#203
of 1,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,616
of 26,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inventiones mathematicae
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.