↓ Skip to main content

Yield and cost-effectiveness of laboratory testing to identify metabolic contributors to falls and fractures in older persons

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Osteoporosis, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Yield and cost-effectiveness of laboratory testing to identify metabolic contributors to falls and fractures in older persons
Published in
Archives of Osteoporosis, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11657-015-0226-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate Johnson, Pushpa Suriyaarachchi, Mohammed Kakkat, Derek Boersma, Piumali Gunawardene, Oddom Demontiero, Cara Tannenbaum, Gustavo Duque

Abstract

Falls and fractures constitute a major cause of morbidity and mortality among older adults. Although falls and fractures share similar risk factors, there is no integrated approach to identifying secondary causes of both entities. We report a cost-effective approach to identify metabolic causes of falls and fractures in the clinical setting. Falls and fractures are a major cause of morbidity and mortality among older adults. Metabolic disorders contributing to the combined risk of falls and fractures are frequent but often go undetected. The most efficient and cost-effective laboratory screening strategy to unmask these disorders remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to identify the most cost-effective laboratory tests to detect undiagnosed metabolic contributors and to decide treatment of these disorders in older persons. This is a cross-sectional study design, which included all participants attending the Falls & Fractures Clinic, Nepean Hospital (Penrith, Australia) between 2008 and 2013. Chemistry profile included 25(OH) vitamin D, parathyroid hormone (PTH), albumin, creatinine, calcium, phosphate, vitamin B-12, folate, and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) for all patients, and serum testosterone in men. The number of new diagnoses identified and their cost-effectiveness (cost in US$ per patient screened and cost per new diagnosis) were calculated. A total of 739 participants (mean age 79, 71 % female) were assessed. Among 233 participants with complete laboratory tests, previously undiagnosed disorders were identified in 148 (63.5 %). Vitamin D deficiency (27 %) and hyperparathyroidism (21.5 %) were the most frequent diagnoses. A testing strategy including serum vitamin D, calcium, PTH, creatinine/estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and TSH for all patients and serum testosterone in men would have been sufficient to identify secondary causes of falls and fractures in 94 % of patients at an estimated cost of $190.19 per patient screened and $257.64 per diagnosis. The minimum cost-effective battery for occult metabolic disorders in older adults at risk of falls and fractures should include serum vitamin D, PTH, TSH, creatinine/eGFR, testosterone (in men), and calcium.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 15 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Unspecified 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 21 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#15,813,427
of 25,030,708 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Osteoporosis
#331
of 687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,958
of 269,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Osteoporosis
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,030,708 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.